Comments on: A brief(er) history of time: Part two http://vulcanis.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/a-briefer-history-of-time-part-two/ Discussing the stuff that matters Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:52:00 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: H4ckJack http://vulcanis.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/a-briefer-history-of-time-part-two/#comment-192 H4ckJack Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:53:16 +0000 http://vulcanis.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/a-briefer-history-of-time-part-two/#comment-192 I came up across this interview looking up for "Variations of Deism" on Google (was trying to look for the closest definition of my "religion" -- actual form of thought). I must admit that finding a person that thinks the EXACT SAME WAY you do is pretty damn unlikely, but I must say I just did find it. Mr. mjackson75 there just made a relation of how I (and, apparently, he also) think. Usually there would be an "Yes, I agree but not on all aspects!"... not here! Impressive! The St. Anselm reference was one of the mind-blowing coincidences in our views, the "selfish" nature of man was another. Thank you for this nice initiative! Whaddaya know! It served after all! I came up across this interview looking up for “Variations of Deism” on Google (was trying to look for the closest definition of my “religion” — actual form of thought).

I must admit that finding a person that thinks the EXACT SAME WAY you do is pretty damn unlikely, but I must say I just did find it.

Mr. mjackson75 there just made a relation of how I (and, apparently, he also) think. Usually there would be an “Yes, I agree but not on all aspects!”… not here! Impressive! The St. Anselm reference was one of the mind-blowing coincidences in our views, the “selfish” nature of man was another.

Thank you for this nice initiative! Whaddaya know! It served after all!

]]> By: Dennis Quine http://vulcanis.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/a-briefer-history-of-time-part-two/#comment-149 Dennis Quine Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:26:04 +0000 http://vulcanis.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/a-briefer-history-of-time-part-two/#comment-149 V: Article in Jan 19 2008 edition of "New Scientist" concerning time and its nature ('Time's Up"). It appears that researchers on the frontier are as confused as the rest of us. I don't think the explanation of different current theories is done very well, either. DHQ V:
Article in Jan 19 2008 edition of “New Scientist” concerning time and its nature (‘Time’s Up”).

It appears that researchers on the frontier are as confused as the rest of us. I don’t think the explanation of different current theories is done very well, either.

DHQ

]]>